| Date: | Thursday July 24, @07:27AM |
|---|---|
| Author: | ewing2001 |
| Topic: | Corporate Crime |
| from the PacificNews dept. | |
Pacific News Service - Jul 22, 2003
As maritime traffic snarls in a narrow waterway between Malaysia and Indonesia and nearby Islamic fundamentalism looms, giant China wants to build a canal through Thailand as an alternate way to ship oil. It's a development with huge implications for the economies of the region.
The mother of all maritime traffic jams is looming in Asia. Currently 50,000 ships, many of them giant oil tankers, traverse the Malacca Straits between Malaysia and Indonesia each year. Since the 17th century, visionaries have dreamed about finding a shorter route by building a canal through Thailand's narrow-necked Kra isthmus. Now Malacca traffic snarls, changing geopolitics and China's burgeoning thirst for oil might finally make that dream a reality.
Naval experts call the 621-mile Malacca Straits, as narrow as 1.5 miles in some parts, the world's foremost choke-point. With half of its 1.3 billion people now living in industrialized cities and towns, China's need for Middle Eastern oil could clog the straits by adding thousands of tankers to the traffic. Already, 80 percent of the oil that fuels economic superpower Japan comes through the Malacca Straits.
What has moved the Chinese into shooting for the Kra canal are their dashed hopes for getting Russian and Central Asian oil and natural gas through a multi-billion dollar pipeline. China and Russia are good friends, but both the Chinese government and some big American oil companies tripped up on Russian corruption and in-house rivalries. The Enron-like mess of the Russian energy industry threw a monkey wrench into Chinese economic expansion. Now they are looking southward instead.
Articles have already appeared in China with headings entitled "Abandon the Malacca Straits and build the Thai Kra Canal." And a subtitle says, "This is shaking Southern Asia." Southern Asia, in Chinese eyes, includes all the countries from Southeast Asia through South Asia and Southwest Asia (aka the Middle East). Countries along the Malacca Straits like Singapore and Indonesia are understandably nervous that if the Kra canal becomes the shortest route from Europe and the Middle East to North Asia, their economies will be devastated.
These Chinese analysts as well as others point out that a shorter route will save time and money. But an unspoken reason for the bypass is that Indonesia's turbulent Aceh region has long shores along the Malacca Straits. And the turbulence has roots in Islamic fundamentalism. If the Aceh fundamentalists should gain power, then the whole Malacca Straits could be too risky as the sole lifeline to East Asia's economic powerhouses.
No wonder the Kra canal is a hot topic within ASEAN, or the Association of South East Asian Nations. ASEAN was formed in 1962 as a bulwark against Communist expansionism, especially by China and North Vietnam. Now Communist Vietnam is a full member. And Communist China along with Japan, South Korea and the United States are members of two auxiliary groups of "advisers."
ASEAN+1 (U.S.A) provides the military backup that is now focused on the War on Terror. ASEAN+3 (China, Japan and South Korea) provides the economic backup. On the War on Terror front, ASEAN has already pitched in with Japan, sending a thousand troops to Iraq. On the economic side, the Kra canal will be a monumental undertaking.
Planetark -July 9, 2002
BEIJING - Pro-Tibet activists accused oil giants last week of exploiting lands they said were under Chinese occupation, by agreeing to help build a $20 billion gas pipeline in China's Muslim-majority region of Xinjiang.
Royal Dutch/Shell Group, the lead partner in the consortium of three oil majors, responded that the project would bring jobs and cash to some of China's poorest areas and help clean up smoggy coastal cities.
The 4,000-km (2,500-mile) pipeline will snake from the deserts of the northwestern region of Xinjiang, home to Turkic-speaking ethnic Uighurs, to the eastern city of Shanghai to slake a growing thirst for energy.
China signed a deal last week with Shell, ExxonMobil Corp and Russia's Gazprom to build the system, which could deliver its first gas by late next year.
The London-based Free Tibet Campaign said the pipeline was part of a strategy by Beijing to consolidate political power in troubled western areas through a push for economic development.
"Free Tibet Campaign, working in solidarity with exiled Uighurs, opposes the West-East pipeline on the grounds that China is exploiting resources which rightfully belong to people under occupation," the group said in a statement.
Free Tibet mainly lobbies for independence for Tibet, a Buddhist theocracy until 1951 when Communist Chinese troops marched in, but the group has also pressured oil giants to avoid the pipeline.
The Russian-Chinese Tibet Pipeline deal
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies.
printed from Chinas Oil Canal Project in Thailand on 2004-05-31 11:01:55