| Date: | Tuesday October 14, @06:23PM |
|---|---|
| Author: | ewing2001 |
| Topic: | Bush |
| from the AP/ABC dept. | |
ABC -October 14, 2003
WASHINGTON (Oct. 14) - The Supreme Court cleared the way Tuesday for state laws allowing ill patients to smoke marijuana if a doctor recommends it. Justices turned down the Bush administration's request to consider whether the federal government can punish doctors for recommending or perhaps just talking about the benefits of the drug to sick patients. An appeals court said the government cannot.
Nine states have laws legalizing marijuana for people with physician recommendations or prescriptions: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Maine, Nevada, Oregon and Washington. And 35 states have passed legislation recognizing marijuana's medicinal value.
But federal law bans the use of pot under any circumstances.
The case gave the court an opportunity to review its second medical marijuana
case in two years. The last one involved cannabis clubs.
This one presented a more difficult issue, pitting free-speech rights of
doctors against government power to keep physicians from encouraging illegal drug
use. A ruling for the Bush administration would have made the state medical
marijuana laws unusable.
Some California doctors and patients, in filings at the Supreme Court,
compared doctor information on pot to physicians' advice on ''red wine to reduce the
risk of heart disease, Vitamin C, acupuncture, or chicken soup.''
The administration argued that public heath - not the First Amendment
free-speech rights of doctors or patients - was at stake.
...Keith Vines, a prosecutor in San Francisco who used marijuana to combat
HIV-related illnesses, was among those who challenged a federal policy put in place
during the Clinton administration. That policy required the revocation of
federal prescription licenses of doctors who recommend marijuana.
''If the government is zipping them up, and we're not being told about
options, that's negligence,'' Vines said.
Policy supporters contend that the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration must
be allowed to protect the public.
The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said that
physicians should be able to speak candidly with patients without fear of government
sanctions, but they can be punished if they actually help patients obtain the
drug.
The case is Walters v. Conant, 03-40.
10-14-03 1631EDT
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective companies.
printed from State Laws Allowing Marijuana for Medical Reasons on 2004-06-22 15:18:50