It's Official: NYC Council Opposes War

posted by admin on Wednesday March 12, @12:55PM

POSTED: 3:57 p.m. EST March 12, 2003

UPDATED: 4:10 p.m. EST March 12, 2003

NEW YORK -- In a vote that elicited a range of emotional responses, the City Council approved a resolution Wednesday opposing war with Iraq except as a last resort.

The 31-17 vote in the city hardest hit by the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks came after months of behind-the-scenes debate about whether the council should take a position, particularly given the city's position as a symbol in the war on terrorism.

"If we're going to be looking for a fight, let's fight poverty, let's fight firehouse closures, let's fight racism and sexism," said Yvette Clarke, a Brooklyn Democrat who supported the resolution.

Advertisement

But Queens Democrat Alan Jennings said that after losing one of his closest friends in the World Trade Center attack, he was in no mood to vote for an anti-war measure.

"Our troops are in the Middle East at this time to fight for our democracy," Jennings said. "I think this resolution sends the wrong message to our men and women in uniform."

The resolution was first drawn up in October, but got stalled in back-room battles over semantics. Last month, it was abruptly pulled off the agenda moments before the council had been scheduled to vote on it.

The wording of the original resolution opposed a war "without the authority of the United Nations" and said that such a war would pave the way for "similar "actions by other rival states such as Taiwan and China and India and Pakistan."

Those words were replaced with language that allows for a pre-emptive attack if "other options for achieving compliance with United Nations resolutions calling for the elimination of weapons of mass destruction and the means of their development have failed."

Despite the toned-down language, City Council Speaker Gifford Miller, a Manhattan Democrat who is the leader of the panel, said the measure was clearly "an anti-war resolution."

"War should be the last possible resort and we're not sure we've reached that last possible point," Miller said.

Debate over the resolution seeped out publicly in recent weeks after 100,000 to 350,000 people took part in an anti-war protest near the United Nations last month. Recent polls show that 75 percent of New Yorkers oppose a war without the support of the United Nations.

Since last September, anti-war resolutions have been approved in cities including Los Angeles; Kalamazoo, Mich.; Chicago; Portland, Maine; and Milwaukee.

Copyright 2003 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Source...
Discuss...

<  US in disarray as - UN Security - council support crumbles | Cheney is Still Paid by Pentagon Contractor  >