|
|
|
|
Deception Dollars t-shirts Sections
911 Main
- About - GFP HOF - My GFP - Older Stuff - Past Polls - Submit Story - Video - mp3 - SGTV SGTV/INN
Watch SGTV, our TV show, every Thursday on MNN webcast, 8 PM EST Watch INN World Report, our new cooperation partner, every Friday (Repeats on Saturday + Sunday) on Free Speech TV, MNN and many other Public Access Channels, 6 PM EST. INN is also our new breaking news partner. Their news shows incl. Interview Highlights with John Pilger, Joe Conason, Michael Meacher, Bev Harris, Cynthia McKinney, Sander Hicks and many others... 911 Encyclopedia
Ewing2001 Has compiled a comprehensive list of links an articles pertaining to 911. This is required reading for anyone interested in understanding that horrid day ESPECIALLY since the presstitutes refuse to their job.
Mike Malloy pulls no punches with the FLYING MONKEY RIGHT. If you want to hear a REAL liberal tell it like it is don't miss his show! Listen Daily 9pm to 12pm One Year Later
Tune in to get a liberal helping of the TRUTH. Peter Werbe stands up to the neo-cons and for liberal cause daily while keeping us all informed on the daily events that are shaping our world. Listen Daily 2pm till 5pm Liberal Talk Radio In Florida! Spread the word. Tell your friends to listen in. Call the station every Saturday and give them your supportive comments (239-732-9369). Call The Guy James Show live on the air (239-530-1660). The Randi Rhodes Show Books
All Books
Greg Palast: Updated: with %40 more pages than the hard cover.
Alex Jones Video
Global Outlook
Michel Chossudovsky's Magazine on 911 and Post-911 Analysis Issue No.5-out now:Bush's "Project for a New American Century" Was 9/11 a Hoax? Diving up the Spoils of War Website Topics of the month: Was Kelly assassinated for "pulling the plug" The Forged Intelligence on Iraq Who's Who on the 9/11 "Independent" Commission Hot ranking thread: CIA closed friend with the finanzsystem of Al-Quida!
Counterpunch
|
North Korea Threatens Demonstration or Export of Nuclear Weaponsposted by NYC on Thursday April 24, @05:04PM![]() from the North-Korea dept. North Korea Says It Has Nuclear Arms At Talks With U.S., Pyongyang Threatens 'Demonstration' or Export of Weapon By Glenn Kessler, Washington Post Staff Writer Friday, April 25, 2003; Page A01 North Korean negotiators have told U.S. officials in Beijing that the communist nation has nuclear weapons and threatened to export them or conduct a "physical demonstration," U.S. officials said yesterday. Pyongyang has never before said it had nuclear weapons, though the CIA has estimated it has produced one or possibly two devices. North Korea's unexpected declaration is certain to alarm its neighbors and heighten the crisis atmosphere over its nuclear ambitions. Continued.
But North Korea also hinted it might be willing to eventually give up its weapons, officials said, which some saw as a small ray of hope amid the bluster of the North Korean stance. Speaking in Washington, Secretary of State Colin L. Powell warned North Korea that the United States would not "be intimidated by bellicose statements or by threats or actions they think might get them more attention or might force us to make a concession that we would not otherwise make." "They're back to the old blackmail game," President Bush said last night in an interview on NBC. U.S. officials said North Korea declared it had nuclear weapons as officials were milling about in corridors on Wednesday, the first day of the talks among the United States, North Korea and China. The top North Korean official at the talks, Li Gun, pulled aside the highest-ranking American present, Assistant Secretary of State James A. Kelly, and told him that North Korea had nuclear weapons. "We can't dismantle them," Li told Kelly. "It's up to you whether we do a physical demonstration or transfer them." U.S. officials are still puzzling over the statement and its exact meaning, including whether North Korea was threatening to test a nuclear weapon. But, a senior official said, "it was very fast, very categorical and obviously very scripted." The North Koreans appeared to play down their admission, saying they had told the United States in 1993 they had nuclear weapons. But U.S. officials have contacted former Clinton administration officials and there appears to be no record of such a statement. North Korea has a history of claiming it made statements in the past that were never made. During the plenary session, Li, deputy director of American affairs for North Korea's Foreign Ministry, also told the Americans that North Korea has just about completed reprocessing 8,000 spent fuel rods into plutonium for weapons -- a statement not confirmed by U.S. intelligence. Officials believe that may just be a bluff, but it is a sobering bluff: Analysts have said the fuel rods could be turned into material for two to three nuclear bombs within a few months. During the talks, Kelly pressed to confirm that Li truly meant to say the reprocessing has been completed, because North Korean officials have made contradictory statements in the past. If the North Korean assertion about reprocessing is correct, it would signify a massive intelligence failure by the United States. The crisis began in October, when Washington said North Korea admitted to a covert program to make highly enriched uranium for nuclear arms. It intensified earlier this year, when North Korea restarted a plutonium reactor it had frozen under a 1994 pact with the United States. During this week's talks, the North Koreans outlined what was described as an extensive proposal for ending the crisis. In effect, U.S. officials said, North Korea wants to reestablish the 1994 agreement under which it would give up its nuclear programs in exchange for a steady supply of energy -- but the dismantling of the programs would only take place once Washington fulfilled its end of the bargain. The U.S. delegation emphasized that the administration would accept nothing less than the complete and verifiable dismantling of North Korea's nuclear programs, including the restoration of international inspections, before progress could be made on other areas of the U.S.-North Korean relationship. The U.S. delegation was under strict instructions not to negotiate. Still, one official said, the small opening in the North Korean statement might provide a reason to continue to another round of talks. The official said North Korea's Kim Jong Il apparently does not realize Bush has no intention of cutting a deal along the lines of the 1994 pact. "Kim will not get this president's attention without getting rid of his nuclear programs," he said. State Department spokesman Richard A. Boucher said the administration would carefully review the talks before deciding how to respond. The North Koreans "said a lot of things that require careful analysis before anybody jumps out and makes grand pronouncements on it means this and it means that," he said. "The story should not be that San Francisco is about to be incinerated," one government official said. "This is the beginning of a long process." Yesterday, the second day of the talks, the three parties did not meet together. Instead, China held separate sessions with the United States and with North Korea. U.S. officials said it was unclear if any further talks would take place on the planned third day. Kelly planned to leave Friday for Seoul and Tokyo to brief the South Koreans and Japanese. In its first official comment on the talks, China, a major supplier of food and energy to North Korea, said yesterday the discussions had helped promote understanding and would help in finding a solution. But a U.S. official said that Chinese privately were "in disbelief over Li Gun's categorical statements" and disappointed that the United States and North Korea had such intractable positions. During the talks, U.S. officials said, China said it supported a denuclearized Korean Peninsula and noted that North Korea had promised South Korea in 1992 that Pyongyang would not develop nuclear weapons. "Strong views were presented" at the talks, Powell said. "The North Koreans presented their point of view strongly; the Chinese did, as well, as did the United States." North Korea, meanwhile, said yesterday it was ready to settle the dispute but that the "master key" for successful talks was for the United States to drop its hostile policy toward Pyongyang. "The situation on the Korean Peninsula is so tense that a war may break out any moment due to the U.S. moves," North Korea's KCNA news agency said, adding that relations with the United States had hit "rock bottom" because of Bush's statement that North Korea was part of an "axis of evil," along with Iran and Iraq. KCNA said the war in Iraq had shown the only way for a country to protect itself was to have a strong military deterrent. A senior administration official said that U.S. intelligence agencies had no indication that North Korea was acting on its threat, either to test or to export nuclear material or weapons. "If they only have two nuclear bombs" and they conduct a test, "they'll rapidly run through their stock," said the official. Correspondent John Pomfret in Beijing and staff writer Dana Priest in Washington contributed to this report. © 2003 The Washington Post Company http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A32198-2003Apr24.html
< North Korea warns it may use nuclear weapons | What Happened to America? by Martin Schreader > |
Global Free Press Login
Related Links
| ||||
|
||||||
[ home | contribute story | older articles | past polls | faq | authors | preferences ]
FAIR
USE NOTICE: This
site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been
specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues,
etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes
of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Powered by daVinci Interactive and Slashcode
Add
GFP to your PALM via AvantGo
Add GFP HeadLines to your site XML
or RDF
Questions or Comments
Regarding This Site
webmaster@globalfreepress.com