|
| |
  |
| NY Paper about 9/11 Activists: Bush knew |
|
 |
 |
posted by ewing2001
on Sunday December 21, @10:51AM
from the Staten-Island-Advance dept.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Update: 9/11 widow fights, won’t settle
"Ellen Mariani wants answers" : "Lawsuit against President Bush and others" (Portsmouth Herald 12/24)
AP (12/24)
Update: Ellen Mariani's lawsuit and DC Press Conference Footage now also linked at Pravda Forum (12/23)
Update:
Another lawsuit: Firefighter families "want to get to the truth" (12/24)
Update: Families sue U.S., reject 9/11 `bribe' (Toronto Star, Mariani's case not mentioned 12/23)
Sign the Petition of Mariani/Berg
Update: Exclusive Footage of Mariani/Berg DC-Press Conference now up at
INN World Report
Rackateering lawsuit over 9-11 coverup (12/23)
Ellen Mariani's lawsuit against Bush Admin now mentioned in NY paper
Democratic presidential candidates take up the cry from 9/11 activists
White House stonewalling August, 2001 briefing fuels suspicions
NY Staten Island Advance -Sunday, December 21, 2003
Bush knew?
Former Vermont Gov. and current presidential candidate Howard Dean is just the latest Democratic critic of President Bush to suggest that he had foreknowledge of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.
Off and on for over the last two years, Democrats have flirting with the allegation ever since then Rep. Cynthia McKinney of North Carolina blurted it out during an April 2002 interview on a Berkely, Calif., radio station.
"We know there were numerous warnings of the events to come on Sept. 11," declared the fiery Ms. McKinney, who was subsequently defeated for re-election by a Democratic primary opponent. "What did this administration know and and when did they know it?...Who else knew and why did they not warn the innocent people of New York who were needlessly murdered?"
|
|
 |
 |
  |
| AFP: Hussein Was Held by Kurds Before "Capture" |
|
 |
 |
posted by ewing2001
on Saturday December 20, @03:59PM
from the Bloomberg/AFP dept.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Hussein Was Held by Kurds Before U.S. Capture, AFP Reports
Update: Revealed: who really found Saddam? (Sunday Herald 12/21)

Bloomberg/AFP ABC Australia
Dec. 21 (Bloomberg) -- Saddam Hussein was captured by U.S. troops only after being held prisoner by Kurdish forces, who had had drugged and abandoned him, Agence France-Presse reported, citing a Sunday Express newspaper report.
The Kurdish Patriotic Front, which fought alongside U.S. forces during the Iraq war, held Hussien until it negotiated for more political advantage in the Middle East, AFP said, citing the paper, which quoted an unidentified Iraqi intelligence officer.
|
|
 |
 |
  |
| Halliburton accused of stonewalling |
|
 |
 |
posted by ewing2001
on Friday December 19, @05:24AM
from the Asia-Times dept.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Help

...in the last 2 weeks, Global Free Press has experienced a HUGE increase in traffic; so much so that you may have had trouble getting onto the site recently.
We need your help!
Not one person involved with Global Free Press is paid; this is a very idealistic endeavor we are working on. We have donated our time and effort because we are devoted to TRUTH.
We will gladly continue to provide all of our services free of charge to the world, but as our readership increases so must our bandwidth. Otherwise we will be overloaded and inaccessible.(Dial-up users, please check "My GFP")
Thanks to everyone, who already donated. Happy Holidays and Merry Xmas :)
Newsflash: Coming up on INN, 6 PM EST: VideoClip from Mariani/Berg Press Conference in DC- 9/11 Lawsuit vs. Bush Administration, LiveStream
Halliburton unscathed by overcharge flap
Halliburton says internal audit shouldn't have been made public
ABC 28 -December 19
Washington-AP -- According to Vice President Cheney's former company Halliburton, the Pentagon had no business reading a company audit.
In fact, a Halliburton spokeswoman says a Pentagon auditor may have broken the law by reading the internal audit.
Asia Times -December 20
By Hussain Khan
TOKYO - The timely capture of Saddam Hussein virtually eclipsed, for a while, the embarrassing scandal involving the apparent US$128 million overcharging of US taxpayers by Halliburton, Vice President Dick Cheney's old firm, which received $7 billion in no-bid contracts for oil services and other work in Iraq. The total overcharge, revealed by a Pentagon audit, covers about $61 million for fuel and another $67 million for supplying army food services.
|
|
 |
 |
  |
| War: Saddam’s Capture Means Trouble for U.S. Officials |
|
 |
 |
posted by admin
on Wednesday December 17, @04:50PM
from the fff.org dept.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
UPDATE: NMU (11/5/01): Bush blocks release of Reagan White House papers

Rumsfeld-Saddam Handshake, Buddies Bush + Reagan, Reagan with Caspar Weinberger, George Shultz, Ed Meese, and Don Regan discussing the President's remarks on the Iran-Contra affair
http://www.fff.org/comment/com0312f.asp
by
Jacob G. Hornberger,
December 15, 2003
In his official statement
celebrating the capture of Saddam Hussein, President Bush announced
that “the former dictator of Iraq will face the justice he denied to
millions.” Notably lacking from the president’s statement, however, was
whether the U.S. government would agree to relinquish control over
Saddam’s trial to the Iraqi government or to an international tribunal
consisting of independent judges.
Why wouldn’t U.S. officials readily
agree to relinquish jurisdiction over Saddam’s trial? Because of their
need to closely guard the secrets that Saddam Hussein has in his
possession — secrets that would cause no small amount of embarrassment
to the U.S. government, including former president Ronald Reagan,
former vice-president and former president George H.W. Bush (the
president’s father), and Donald Rumsfeld, the president’s secretary of
defense.
One of those secrets is the extent
of the relationship that existed between the Reagan and Bush I
administrations and Saddam Hussein, the details of which have never
been fully disclosed by U.S. officials. There is, of course, the famous photograph
on the Internet in which Rumsfeld and Saddam are shaking hands and
making conversation in Baghdad in 1983. How did that meeting get set
up? Who was involved in the decision-making process? What was
discussed? What agreements were entered into?
Saddam’s testimony at trial could
provide some of the answers. And that prospect — of Saddam Hussein
testifying freely, openly, and publicly about his relationship with
Ronald Reagan, President Bush I, and Donald Rumsfeld — would
undoubtedly strike terror into the hearts and minds of many U.S.
officials.
|
|
 |
 |
  |
| 9/11 Chair: Attack Was Preventable |
|
 |
 |
posted by admin
on Wednesday December 17, @12:22PM
from the cbsnews.com dept.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Kean promises major revelations in public testimony beginning next month
Update: Kristen Breitweisers Hardball Transcript (12/18)
Update: Tom Kean is backpaddling on Nightline again
Interview with Lorie v. Auken (9/11 Widow) and Kyle Hence (9/11 Citizen's Watch) about Kean on CBS -Salon 12/19
Update: "I don't expect to have any new friends after this is done" (Kean, NJ.com 12/18)
White House refused to comment directly on the CBS interview (NY Daily News 12/18)
Tonight on ABC Nightline, 11 PM EST: "Could it Have Been Prevented?",
Kristen Breitwieser on Hardball, MSNBC, 7 PM EST
"We could have halted 9/11" NY Post (12/17)
Attack Was Preventable
Fox (12/17)
CBS-Transcript released at ABC Australia, 12/18 and CBS
NEW YORK, Dec. 17, 2003
CBS News
(CBS) For the first time, the
chairman of the independent commission investigating the Sept. 11
attacks is saying publicly that 9/11 could have and should have been
prevented, reports CBS News Correspondent Randall Pinkston.
"This is a very, very important part of history and we've got to tell it right," said Thomas Kean.
"As you read the report, you're going to have a pretty clear idea
what wasn't done and what should have been done," he said. "This was
not something that had to happen."
|
|
 |
 |
  |
| Boston Globe: Saddam's capture didn't change anything |
|
 |
 |
posted by ewing2001
on Wednesday December 17, @08:29AM
from the Boston-Globe dept.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Still no mass weapons, no ties to 9/11, no truth
Update: 'Weapons of Mass Destruction'? For Bush, They Are a Nonissue (NY Times 12/18)
Boston Globe -December 17
By Derrick Z. Jackson
THE INVASION was still a lie. The capture of Saddam Hussein changes nothing about that. There were too many forked tongues in the road to his lair. The way we removed the dictator, we became a global dictatorship.
|
|
 |
 |
  |
| Ashcroft and Cheney on new Hot Seat |
|
 |
  |
| Congress Member McDermott: Saddam Capture staged "for political ends" |
|
 |
 |
posted by ewing2001
on Tuesday December 16, @06:32PM
from the WashTimes dept.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Update:
How did the US confirm Saddam's identity so quickly? (Guardian 12/18)
Update: Former Secretary of State Albright: Bin Laden October Surprise orchestrated by Bush was "a possibility." (12/17)
Update: Austria's Haider: Saddam Capture was
"slapstick" and a "real scam" (12/17)
Update: More Iraq-lies revealed -75 Senators were told Iraqi weapons could hit U.S (12/16)
Saddam capture staged, McDermott charges

Washington Times - Wed Dec 17, 2003
Rep. Jim McDermott of Washington, the Democratic congressman who went to Baghdad last year to say that President Bush would lie to the American people in order to justify war, has now accused the president of timing Saddam Hussein's capture for political ends.
He told a Seattle radio interviewer Monday that American forces could have captured Saddam "a long time ago if they wanted."
Asked by interviewer Dave Ross on KIRO-FM whether the capture was timed to help the president, he replied: "Yeah. Oh, yeah. There's too much by happenstance for it to be just a coincidental thing."
|
|
 |
 |
  |
| 911: Bush's still under pressure for 9/11 Prior Knowledge |
|
 |
 |
posted by ewing2001
on Monday December 15, @07:00PM
from the Dallas-Morning-News/etc dept.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
Dean Spokesman: "The White House needs to be more forthcoming with the 9-11 commission"
NY POST: Bush to label as "an absurd insinuation" Howard Dean's claim (12/16 P. 7)
Bush calls Dean comment about 9-11 warning absurd
Dallasnews (*reg) -December 16 DC Indymedia/Videolink
Dallasnews picked up a response by Bush from Monday Morning, when he was asked in a press conference:
"You've said this is no time for politics but you've also said you wanted to change the tone in Washington. Howard Dean recently seemed to muse aloud whether you had advance knowledge of 9/11.
Do you agree or disagree with the RNC that this kind of rhetoric borders on political hate speech?"
"Yeah. Uuuuh. There is a time for politics, and uh, you know... (long
pause, nervous blinking) ... 'S a time for politics... and I, uh... It's an absurd insinuation."
From the Dallasnews article:
President Bush fended off political questions during his news conference Tuesday – with one notable exception.
Asked about Democratic frontrunner Howard Dean's talk of theories that the president may have had advance warning about Sept. 11, Mr. Bush replied, "It's an absurd insinuation."
|
|
 |
 |
  |
| "Saddam": We never had WMD |
|
 |
<
Today's News | December 22 | December 20
>
|
|
 |
 |
| Corp. |
$now |
$year |
$cap |
| Dow |
10494.23 |
9708.4-10753.6 |
n/a |
| Nasdaq |
2126.11 |
1750.8-2164.6 |
n/a |
| S&P; 500 |
1182.81 |
1053.4-1197.1 |
n/a |
| VA Linux |
2.76 |
1.6-4.8 |
169M |
| Red Hat |
15.70 |
11.2-29.1 |
3B |
| IBM |
96.65 |
81.9-100.4 |
161B |
| Microsoft |
27.36 |
24.0-30.2 |
297B |
| G.E. |
35.71 |
28.9-36.9 |
378B |
Last update:
03:49 GMT (15+ min delay). For informational purposes
only. Not intended for trading purposes. If you're silly enough to do
something based on this data, we're not liable. Data courtesy
Finance::Quote.
|
|
 |
 |
|