"New Democrats" are supporters of PNAC

posted by ewing2001 on Sunday May 18, @08:58AM

Editorial: Democrats are the best Rep-Clone, they ever had

Almost unknown is the fact, that some of the so-called "new Democrats" or DLC, are also supporters of the right wing think-tank PNAC.

One of them is Will Marshall, who signed the "Second Statement on Post-War Iraq" of PNAC.

Will Marshall is the president of the Progressive Policy Institute, an offshoot of the DLC.

Advertisement

One of his latest articles at NewDemocratsOnline was "Blair Democrats: Ready for Battle" from May1st.

The Democrats and the DLC are inflitrated with corruption and hipocricy and seem to be the best Republican Clone, the Reps and the Oil Industry ever had.

Unfortunately, most democrats didn't realise this yet.

While naively still hoping that some Democrats might expose the lies on Iraq and Sep11th, they irresponsibly fade away with distractive issues on taxes and Bush's chickenhawk past instead of concentrating on an Impeachment Campaign and War Crimes only.

But even democratic president candidate, Bob Graham, who is in denial between exposure of reclassified CIA-911 files and using exactly this knowledge to become President, is not much hope.

Graham is the founder and chairman of the Senate New Democrat Coalition. Three other Democratic presidential contenders also are members of the coalition: John Edwards, John Kerry and Joseph Lieberman. All four also are members of the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC).

Graham was recently criticised by the NY POST on his strategy against Bush.

This makes even sense out of the view of a progressive 911Skeptic.

As Bev Conover of Online Journal, correctly pointed out, "Bob Graham makes no secret of his long-standing friendship with Rep. Porter Goss (R-FL), a former CIA agent. Bob's half-brother, the late Philip Graham, who was the publisher of the Washington Post, was a graduate of the Army Intelligence School in Harrisburg, Pa."

Bob Graham, Porter Goss and Nancy Pelosi received all shortened letters of the August 2001 CIA-memo to George Bush, which included a clear warning on an attack against America.

They all had prior knowledge of Sep11th and both Graham and Goss met the Pakistan Secret Service only a few days before Sep11th- in Washington.

Now only Graham seems to use his insider knowledge to run a suspicious game between power and truth.

But Graham is either investigative journalist or activist.

We don't need Graham to expose the truth. His behavior is only helpful to add more useful headers for progressive and investigative newsletters, not more or less.

Concentrating on him only would be naive, dangerous and helpful for the never ending CIA-scripts of Red Herrings and distractions on purpose.

A Scott Ritter is probably more honest than Graham, but all these Ritter- and Graham headers are at least important to push the investigative and progressive scene on the Internet, at the protests and disobedience events.

There is the revolution, not in the US Congress.

Unfortunately the more honest spokesmen just got silenced again. Their names are McKinney, Waxman, Conyers or Barbara Lee.

It makes them more honorable, that they don't use their opinions to run in 2004. These are the people, who need our support, not Graham or any other one, who just jumped on the bandwagon of doubtful "opposition" campaigns.

To allow the US Government to kill more people for oil until 2004, is disgraceful against the 911Victims. The fight has to be continued for an interim government, not for a manipulated or rigged election in a couple of months, which might have been martial-lawed at that time.

As a recent british study found out, ALL politicians lie.

Therefore we should not waste time with Sharptons, Kerrys (Skulls + Bones), Deans, Edwards, Daschles, Gephardts or most disgusting, Hillary Clinton.

A new, most honest president might have a totally different name. It could be Susan Sarandon, Mike Ruppert or even Seymour Hersh.

Who knows and who even cares right now. It's not important.

When Poland started their revolution in the 80s, noone might have foreseen, that a car mechanic would become their new leader, Lech Walesa. But almost 20 years later, the same country is run by Lockheed.

There is no ultimate truth, when corporate identity runs this world.

There is more to do than only to dig for the truth and a candidate.

There is no need to divide the world in democrats and republicans or Kucinichs and Pauls.

A new movement is only as good as they have no straight label, otherwise they just got discredited as supporter of the old structures.

These structures died on Sep11th and need not to be relaunched anymore. This is the effect of a paradigm change, which started a long time before Sep11th and is run by incalculative rules of physics or momenti of random and resistance.

There is no resistance in the US Congress, it's on the streets and one mouseclick away, on the better independent media websites.

We can't have hope in an honest democratic candidate, we have to have hope in becoming our own media.

This country needs to have a regime change in both republican and democratic leaderships before new rules can be discussed.

This paradigm change consist too many questions on new leaders, which are still unanswered, too.

It's like a baseball game. The winner of the game shall be that team which shall have scored, in accordance with these rules, the greater number of runs at the conclusion of a regulation game.

At the end it may have been the final batter or pitcher, who was the most helpful player.

We will recognise these players at the end of the game, we don't have to concentrate on the runners.

<  No wonder Jessica Lynch has amnesia (Newsday) | Richard Perle among this year's Bilderberg Conference Members  >