AAUAplanes09112001whathappened -October 12, 2003

Understanding what occurred September 11, 2001, is not so easy for the common run of citizens. It is difficult for him to preserve its curiosity and its azurean serenity, not only for personal reasons, but also because those who hold the control levers of the dominating media, relayed by their grasshopping battalions of journalists, are allergic to the hesitations and live, by the funds and the public which they touch, on the maintenance of a certain conformity.

They thus mislead the few gifted spirits which populate our taught reading and writing people. In the case which interests us, a serious and productive debate on the sources would have allowed curious people to make a bit of an opinion. But this debate was lamentably swept by all these press groups which are huge by the powers but impotent by the bowels.

Let's first consider the material investigations. Fragments of the towers of the World Trade Center ( W.T.C. ) were recycled in record time and engineers responsible for an inquiry had to face bureaucratic restrictions and were subjected to threats of being fired - not less! ( New York Times, December 25, 2001, "Expert Urging Broader Inquiry in Towers' Fall " by James   Glanz and Eric   Lipton ).

A leading article of the January 2002  issue of Fire Engineering, titled $elling Out the Investigation, recalled that the official survey carried out under the aegis of the Federal the Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) into the ruins of the WTC was a " half-baked joke ", and that the majority of the steel remains had been sent in remote countries after three months. What's more, a team of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) could only devote itself  to a three-day "tourist trip" ...