1:6 Air National Guard Mission and Vision statements
1:7 Russian Air Force chief says official 9/11 story
impossible
Scrambling of fighter jets to intercept stray aircraft is
a routine proceedure.
Here's an example of how routine it is.
1.13 Jet Sent to probe Fla. Gov. Plane. Netscape
news. May 15 2003.
The proceedures were already in place before Sept 11
2001.
It happened 67 times in the 10 months between September
2000 and June 2001.
1.8 Use of military jets jumps since 9/11. Associated
Press Aug 13 2002.
1.9 CBS News. Scrambling to prevent another 9/11 Aug 14
2002
1.10 Preventing another 9/11 Military.com
1.11 ABC News Jets on high Alert. Aug 13 2002.
1.12 Military now notified immediately of unusual air
traffic events. Fox news Aug 12 2002
So on Sept 11, 2001 - Why were no fighter jets scrambled, and
why has a cover up story been concocted?
In the unlikely event that the airforce failed through
incompetence, ( not once but 4 times! ) where is the major
inquiry?
I have seen bigger inquiries into car crashes at race
tracks.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 2: Complicit behavoir of G.W.Bush
It has become common mythology in the media that George W. Bush
was at Booker Elementary School when he learned of the first WTC crash. This is
a lie. Why is Bush lying about where he was, and what he
knew?
This is not the only lie Bush has told about his movements that
morning. See how many times he has changed his story.
2:2 Sept 11 attacks- evidence of US collusion by Steve
Grey.
(Read the section called "A tangle of lies")
2.3 Bush gets tangled in his lies Part 1. A strange
press conference.
By Jared israel and francisco Gil-White Sept 25 2002.
2:4 Bush Gets Tangled in his 9-11 Lies, Part 2:
White
House Cover-up Creates More Problems than it Solves
by Jared Israel and
Francisco Gil-White [7 October 2002]
2:5 The President as Incompetent Liar: Bush's Claim that
he Saw TV Footage of 1st Plane Hitting WTC
Comments by Jared Israel [Posted
12 September 2002]
Clinton was impeached for lying about an affair. Bush is lying
about where he was, what he was doing and what he knew, during the crucial
period between 8.45 and 9 AM on Sept 11.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why did the President - after being told "America is under
attack" continue to listen to schoolchildren reading for another 25 minutes ?
Why was he cheering, smiling and joking even as it was known that at least one
more hijacked plane was on the loose ? View the TV footage which
proves treason at the top level.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 3: The Ficticious Hijackers
If 19 Arabs hijacked the planes, why are there no Arabic names on
any of the passenger lists? If they used non-Arabic aliases, which of the "
innocents " on the lists are alleged to be the hijackers?
UAL 93 (Pensylvannia crash)
3.4a STILL No Arabs On Flight 77 By Thomas R. Olmsted,
MD
If they are alleged to have been using non- Arabic aliases (19
obviously Arabic men got on board using non-Arabic ID, with 100% success rate ?
), why did the FBI claim that they were traced through the use of credit cards
to buy tickets in their own names?
If 9 of the alleged hijackers were searched before boarding, as
claimed in this article
why is there no airport security footage of them? How did they
(allegedly) get on board with knives, guns, AND electronic guidance
systems, while being searched, but avoiding security cameras and not being on
the passenger lists?
What aliases were they alleged to be using when they were
searched,and if they were not using aliases, why are they not on the passenger
lists?
What of reports that some of the alleged hijackers are still
alive, and had nothing to do with the attacks ?
According to this article
the FBI now claims that the hijackers used gas to subdue the
passengers and crew. If they used gas they would have been affected themselves -
unless they had masks. The story gets better all the time. They somehow got on
board with masks, gas, guns,knives and electronic guidance systems, in spite of
being searched, didn't show up on the airport security cameras, and were not on
the passenger lists. They left flight manuals in Arabic in rented cars outside
the airport ( last minute brushing up on the way there, about how to fly
the things! ) and then crashed the planes in breath taking displays of skilled
piloting. Just to make sure we knew who they were, their passports were
conveniently found in spite of fiery crashes which incinerated the planes and
occupants. So they got on board with false IDs but used their real passports
?
If the mythical Arab hijackers really were on the planes and
airport security systems failed due to incompetence ( not once but 19
times! ), where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into
racehorse doping scandals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interview with Andreas von Buelow. Tagesspiegel Jan 13 2002.
It has become a common myth that Bin Laden has admitted to the
attacks. This simply isn't true.
Bin laden denies terror attacks and points finger
at jews. Annanova news.
Bin laden denies attacks as Taliban talks
holy war. ABC news online Sept 17 2001.
Bin Laden denies being behind attacks. JS
ONline Milwaukee Jornal Sentinal Sept 16 2001
Osama Bin Laden claims terrorist attacks in
USA were committed by some American terrorist group. Pravda
Sept 12 2001
Bin laden Denies US attack says paper.
Middle East News
Bin laden says he wasn't behind attacks CNN
sept 17 2001
Bin Laden denies role in attacks.
newsday.com Sept 17 2001
Taliban says Bin Laden denied role in
attacks. Yahoo news Sept 13 2001.
Section 6: Insider trading reveals high level
foreknowledge
In the first few hours after the attacks, it was reported that
investigators were already looking into huge volumes of insider trading on
airline stocks in the weeks leading up to the attacks.
Why has this story since completely disappeared? Do authorities
seriously expect us to believe that more than a year later, they still
do not know who was responsible? Should not alarm bells have been ringing BEFORE
the attacks with these record volumes of trading?
If the executive director of the CIA had previously managed the
firm which handled much of the trade, are we seriously expected to believe that
he doesn't know who was responsible?
Where is the major inquiry? I have seen bigger inquiries into local
government contract scandals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 7: The pentagon frame up and the WTC plane
switch
It is alleged that that American Airlines 77 ( a hijacked Boeing
757 ) crashed into the Pentagon. A Boeing 757 is a very large aircraft
with a wingspan of 125 ft and a length of 155 ft. So how did it
make an initial hole 12 ft wide, collapsing only about a 35 ft
depth of the outer ring of the building - and not leave any wreckage outside
?
This photo of the damage to the Pentagon wall
proves that whatever crashed into the pentagon was NOT AA 77,
which demonstrates the Pentagon attack to have been a self - inflicted
frame up.
For a quick overview of the impossibility of the official
story
For a full physical analysis of the crash scene
Physical and mathematical analysis of Pentagon crash. by Gerard Holmgren
Oct 2002
7:5 The Pentaogn crash hoax
What hit WTC towers? Were they the planes we've been
told ? ( AA 11 and UAL 175)
7.7 The amazing Pentalawn.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Add
GFP to your PALM via AvantGo 
