Comments from a reader (Webfairy)

The firsthit has been a particular source of interest and study to me.

(I made the very poor early closeup linked from this page to http://www.serendipity.li/wot/firsthit.detail.mov")

I would be very interested to see the footage offered as the "Television version." It is obviously from the same liniage as the Taner version of the video, which is broken into frames at thewebfairy.com/911/slideshow/taner

But the Taner version is missing that frame that flashes.

The darker coloration and the blue-green sky (along with a clearer view of the first hit object) are the hallmarks of this video version.

Most footage, including the DVD version, comes from an encoding with faded colors and double exposure in the early frames of the object in the air. Usually, footage from this lineage does show the flash.

Both versions have been decimated -- this means frames, probably 2 out of three or three out of four -- were removed from the footage before it was ever broadcast, making the false impression of the building "hula-ing" in closeup.

In the Taner version, one frame is out of sequence, early on, where it gives the impression of the object pausing in midair. The more common faded out version does not have this peculiarity, but often shows the flash. I believe that the flash effect is from decimating frames on both sides of that image.

I have never seen a Taner derived version that shows the flash before.

I am reworking my information on the firsthit footage, since I realized the footage is decimated (tho I argued a long time that the footage was seen so shortly after the event that it must be intact)and that different versions showing different frames exist.

There is much firsthit footage in my video directory, http://thewebfairy.com/video

I have made a specialty of making enlarged slow motion detail. The flash shown at Rense also originated with me, tho this version is quite degraded.

I've had more experience with decimated footage now, and recognize the jerky motion and faster-than-a-fireball speed as false impressions.

thewebfairy.com/fireplane is a study of a decimated footage.

My site is thewebfairy.com/911

I would be happy to provide footage, details, and whatever service I can provide to help expose this.

The fact that the video was butchered before it was ever seen shows deep complicity somewhere in the media, my personal suspect being Gamma Press, which made zillions of dollars having people in the right places at the right time.

I have a lot of information I would like to share.

Boeing Fuselage Anomaly Should NOT Be There
Boeing 767-222s Aren't Rigged For Pods Or Tanks

From David Sadler 9-11-3

Original Pre-Release at Rense

We are currently engaged in an investigation of this anomaly to the fuselage of the aircraft that hit WTC2 (south tower).

We no longer refer to this plane as UA 175. We call it WTC2-AC for World Trade Center building 2 aircraft.

UA 175 was a commercial Boeing 767-222. Look at as many photos of the 767-222 as you like and you'll not see this configuration. The 767-222 has no hard points for mounting external tanks or such. We are confirming this last statement today.

It matters not, what other arguments are made as to why this ac is UA 175. The proponent of the allegation MUST explain and prove that UA 175 (registration N612UA) had modifications to its fuselage. Further, the proponent must prove that this modification to the fuselage was exhibited upon take off from Logan on that fateful day.

This is a major smoking gun that has been in our faces since the first or second day after the event. This configuration is shown on multiple images of the event from multiple cameras in multiple formats from multiple angles.

Click for Flash/Video

You need Flash4+ to view. The above is a low-grade version from much higher quality video source and the anomaly on the plane was discovered by Rosalee at TheWebfairy

The Incredible 9-11 Evidence We've All been Overlooking

by Leonard Spencer

In trying to piece together what really happened on September 11, a lot of work has been done — much of it useful and interesting — into those 'hijacked' flights for which the publicly-available evidence is sketchy and contradictory.

...There is one flight however that has received insufficient attention and this is American Airlines Flight 11, the plane that allegedly crashed into WTC1, the North Tower. It was the first of the terrorist attacks that day. It has been a big mistake not to subject this flight to the same kind of scrutiny as the others because, unlike the others, a very good and important piece of documentary evidence of this flight exists in the public domain. This is the so-called 'Fireman's Video' and we really haven't looked at it closely enough. It really does deserve a second look.

The story of the 'Fireman's Video' is well known. Two French filmmakers, the Naudet Brothers, were in New York on September 11 making a documentary about the New York Fire Service. The footage shows that, while filming in Canal Street, firemen and crew are distracted by a plane flying low overhead. The camera operator instinctively turns his camera towards the North Tower and, for little more than a second or so, we get a clear view of the plane crashing into the tower. It is a precious, priceless second. It is the one-second of video that really makes the sinister Bush junta nervous. It really gives them nightmares. They really didn't want a professional cameraman to catch that moment on broadcast-quality tape.

If you've got it on tape I strongly suggest you take another look at it, with the pause and frame-forward buttons at the ready. If you don't have it taped you can purchase the documentary in which it appears on video and DVD. It's called simply '9/11'.

Alternatively, download the Fireman's Video in QuickTime (370 Kb). It's not quite as revealing as a good video or DVD copy played through your TV, but it's good enough to see the action and has useful single frame forward and back buttons.

When seen at full speed, you might first of all think that there isn't a great deal to see. There's half a second or so when we see the plane flying through the air then it smashes into the tower, creating an explosion and leaving a great gash across the building. Notice though that immediately before it hits the building the plane emits a brief, bright flash. Notice too that the scar it leaves on the building is rather larger than seems appropriate for the size of the aircraft.

Now pause the sequence at the beginning and advance it frame by frame. Firstly, look at the plane. Does that look like a Boeing jet to you? Is its wingspan wide enough? Does it have engines attached to its wings?

Watch carefully what happens as the plane approaches and crashes into the tower. I leave you to come to your own conclusions about what you see (watch it over and over again, backwards and forwards), but I'll tell you what I see. Immediately before the plane strikes it fires a missile that blows a hole in the building's façade. This is the cause of that brief flash. The plane then begins to disappear neatly into this hole, leaving no wing impressions. Just before it disappears however it fires two more missiles from somewhere near its tail. One goes to the left, one to the right (and up a bit) and it is the blast holes from these three separate missiles that form the great gash across the building.

There's more. Keep an eye on the adjacent east side of the building, which is also visible. See how, a few frames into the explosion, a white jet of smoke erupts out of the east side at the same level as the plane. The jet comes straight out of the wall at right angles to it, not angled in accordance with the trajectory of the plane. Also it's just white smoke and dust, no orange flames or anything like that. It is clearly a bomb going off, creating the gash that appears on the east wall.

I know what I am describing sounds incredible. I suggest only that you look at the footage yourself and come to your own conclusions about what you see.

The plane that hit the North Tower was not American Airlines Flight 11. It was not a Boeing 767. It was a custom-built military plane carrying three missiles that created the impression of a plane crash without leaving any wreckage. In order for it precisely to strike the correct part of the tower (in line with the bomb already planted in the east wall) it must have been flown remotely using cruise navigation. I believe a similar plane was used to strike the Pentagon.

The 'Conspiracy Theorists' have got it dead right this time. The true Flights 11, 175, 77 and 93 were indeed substituted with other planes when the transponders were switched off. Someone hijacked the hijackers to make sure the job was done properly.

The 'Fireman's Video' is Bush's true smoking gun. It is in the public domain and it is even available on DVD. It is probably sitting in the video shelves of thousands and thousands of homes across the world. It is vitally important that the American people see this video frame by frame so they can make their own minds up about what really happened on September 11.

There has been a silent coup in America but few have noticed yet. The Bush Administration is clearly very sinister indeed and God only knows what it has in store for us next. There is a clue though in the things of which it accused Saddam Hussein: building and using weapons of mass destruction (nuclear and biological) and killing his own people. When Bush describes Saddam he is describing himself.

We have entered the Age of the Conjurer and it is going to be a tricky time. The 9-11 stunt was a huge magic trick and we all bought it at first. Magicians can be very convincing. You have to look very hard to see the trick and not be fooled. On this occasion slow motion exposes the sleight of hand, but remember how the magician works: he can make almost anything seem real if he can make his audience look in the wrong place at crucial moments.

Only the American people can now stop the imminent slaughter and the imposition of a global fascist police state, but they are currently sleepwalking into their own enslavement. It may already be too late. But maybe if enough Americans get out their videos and their remote controls (pardon the pun) and take a long hard look at that remarkable footage of that plane hitting the North Tower, then an armed and outraged middle America might just pull it off.

More at Serendipity/Leonard Spencer

Controlled Collapse?

Besides the analysis of the planes, there is also still an ongoing analysis of possible bomb systems in the WTC.
Please check out Webfairy's latest piece: Bombs Fall, Explosions Rise

Please also check out http://wtc.nist.gov/

On Sept 17, they're doing a press event in New York to kick off their "First-person Data Collection Projects" i.e. talking to witnesses.